AudioShelfAboutContact
Help us make the next listen a better one.
AudioShelf welcomes precise corrections, thoughtful guide ideas, and transparent partnership questions. A useful note tells us which page you were reading, what needs attention, and which primary source supports the change.
Corrections and edition changes
Flag a mismatched narrator, wrong cover, broken destination, incomplete series order, or an audiobook edition that no longer matches the recommendation. Include the AudioShelf page and the current publisher, author, or retailer page when possible. We prioritize factual errors and broken shopping paths before subjective requests.
Recommend a guide or title
The best suggestions begin with a listening situation: a family road trip, a first fantasy series, a calm evening routine, or a book-club pick that works in audio. Tell us why the performance suits that moment. Complimentary copies and product samples never guarantee coverage, placement, or a positive recommendation.
Editorial and partnership notes
We consider collaborations that preserve editorial independence and can be disclosed clearly. AudioShelf does not sell rankings, accept payment for undisclosed placement, or trade links. A public editorial inbox is being prepared; until it is live, the policy pages below document our standards and review process.
Accessibility and privacy reports
Tell us when a page is difficult to navigate with a keyboard, screen reader, zoom, reduced motion, or another assistive setting. Include the page address, device, browser, and the step that became difficult. Please do not send Amazon account details, order numbers, payment information, or other sensitive personal data. AudioShelf can review its own pages and outbound destinations, but Amazon must handle questions about an Amazon account, purchase, membership, refund, or delivery.
What makes a report useful
A concise report is usually the fastest to verify: name the page, quote the inaccurate line or button label, explain what happened, and share the best primary source for the correction. Screenshots are useful for visual problems, while broken-link reports should include the destination shown after the click. We review patterns across related guides so one well-documented correction can improve more than a single page.